Friday, September 17, 2010

The Rules of the Game

Today in class, we discussed The Rules of the Game directed by Jean Renoir and how it related to Bazin’s concept of space and time in verisimilitude. We said that the time in the movie matched realistically to the amount of time things would take to do in reality. Also with the concept of space, we discussed the house and the camera walking us from room to room as you would in a real house.

There was something else I realized about the film that I didn’t get a chance to bring up in class. It deals with space and verisimilitude. I was thinking about camera shots. I noticed that many of the shots showed a bunch of different things in each. For instance when the actors would be standing in the hall or some other room, we as the audience would see the stands and vases in the foreground of the actors being focused on, and then the other actors and things happening in the background. It was as if the camera acted as a spectator looking in at everything that was happening which allowed us to feel like we were there, instead of being just a camera focusing on one part of the whole which would have showed us a limited range of what was going on.

My favorite scene in the film could also relate to my idea of space and verisimilitude. It was replayed again today in class as well, but for a different reason than why I like it so much. This scene was when one of the servants was carrying the tray from the kitchen (after gossiping) and the camera follows her out but looks up at Christine and another woman on the staircase without any interruption in the shot. There were a lot more pans and seamless shots in this film, making it much different from the others that we’ve viewed in class with all the fast paced cuts that created collision-like montage. It made The Rules of the Game seem like a “smoother” film.

Monday, September 6, 2010

Man with A Movie Camera

Man with a Movie Camera was actually the first movie screening I went to for this class since I enrolled a week late. I know most people in our class enjoyed the movie and there were a few that didn't, but I surprisingly found myself enjoying it. I've never seen this film before so it was still like watching a new movie, even though it was an old black and white Russian film. 
Before the movie, Beth told to think about this question: Is it really random? Throughout the movie I was watching for signs to see if it was really random or not and I came to the conclusion that it's not really random at all. The theme was about the daily lives of people living and working in Russia and there was also a common use of the element of opposites such as birth and death, marriage and divorce, etc. Even the shots with the camera lens opening and closing couldn’t have been random. Someone had to mechanically force the camera lens to open or close in order for it to “act” as a transition between different scenes.
I especially enjoyed the scenes where the woman was editing the films because it gave me a chance to see how older movies were put together. The soundtrack was amazing and the movie experience wouldn’t have been the same without it. The music in addition to the fast cuts in scenes made daily life in the city seem more exciting than usual.